I have shelf upon shelf of books on learning but if I had to
recommend just one book it would be Make
It Stick by Brown, Roediger and McDaniel. It has one big weakness, and I’ll
come to that later., but what makes it compelling is it’s its laser like focus
on contemporary research on optimal methods of learning, while swatting
pseudo-theories to one side.
1. Counterintuitive
By far the most important message in the book comes at the
start when they boldly claim that most good learning theory is counterintuitive. They set the scene by
explaining why most students are misled by institutions into the wrong
strategies for studying. Intuitively, reading, highlighting, underlining and
rereading seems productive but the evidence suggests it is a largely hopeless strategy for learning. In fact, the evidence shows that we are very poor judges of our own learning. The optimal strategies for learning are in the 'doing' and some of that doing is counterintuitive.
We kid ourselves into thinking we’re mastering something but
this is an illusion of mastery. It’s easy to think you’re learning when the
going is easy – re-reading, underlining, repetition…. but it doesn’t work. To
learn effectively, you must make the going harder and employ a few
counterintuitive tricks along the way. They neatly explain why the research is
NOT about rote learning, the charge that is usually levelled against them - just to head that one off at the pass.
2. Effortful learning
This is the premise – effortful
learning. It’s what most of the people I admire in the learning world have been
saying for years – Schank, Downes and most academic, cognitive scientists. By effort they mostly mean retrieval
practice This is the one strategy they hammer home. Use your own brain to retrieve, or do, what you think you know. Flashcard questions, simple quizzes (not
multiple-choice) anything to exercise the brain through active recall, not only
reinforces what you know (and so easily forget) but may even be even stronger, in
terms of subsequent retention and recall, than the original exposure. That’s a
killer finding. Recall is more powerful than teaching.
3. Testing
Practically, they recommend regular, low-stakes testing for teachers and
learners. And before you get all tetchy about ‘teaching to the test’, they don’t
mean summative assessment but regular formative exercises, where recall is
stimulated and encouraged. The evidence here is pretty overwhelming. Test
little and often – that’s what makes effortful learning stick. To repeat - they don’t mean testing as assessment, they mean learning.
4. Solve before being
taught
Interesting research is also presented for the idea that having a go, even when
you make mistakes and errors, is better than simply getting the exposition. The
active learning seems to have a powerful effect on retention and recall.
5. Spaced-practice
I’ve been banging on about this for decades but they nail
the research, namely its efficacy, and the fact that it is NOT mere repetition.
All of that Bjork stuff on ‘Deliberate difficulties’ is also in here.
6. Interleaving
Rather than doing a homogeneous set of learning or retrieval
tasks, try interleaving them. The evidence suggests that this makes gives you higher retention and you are much
more adaptable when it comes to solving new problems in the future.
7. Delayed feedback
An interesting one this. Apparently, instantaneous feedback
can be less productive than delayed feedback. I’ve used this recently and have
to agree that I see the point.
Storytelling
The book cleverly employs the methods they recommend in its
structure but it has one big weakness - the third author. Whereas I had heard
of Roediger and McDaniel as well published academics, I had never heard of
Peter Brown. It looks as though the publisher has made them hire a novelist to
bring their research to life. Brown introduces each chapter with overwritten stories to illustrate the research but I found them wearisome.
Interestingly, none of their research supports this approach to learning and stories
and storytelling don’t even appear in the index. Read them if you want - I
just skipped them.
Conclusion
The book gives a brilliant update on recent research in
cognitive science on how we learn. (You don’t see Vygotsky in the index of this
book, thank God.) It's the result of over ten years of focused research on 'Applying Cognitive Psychology to Enhance Educational Practice'. It’s practical and gives plenty of advice on both how to
teach and how to learn, the point being that knowing how to learn is a
necessary condition for good teaching.