tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post114220267706693098..comments2024-02-16T08:32:46.618+00:00Comments on Donald Clark Plan B: Brin, Page, Bezos and Wales?Donald Clarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00796341486328270474noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-20501328918705583112012-02-16T15:49:13.570+00:002012-02-16T15:49:13.570+00:00Hi Donald, Only just found this post via Seb citin...Hi Donald, Only just found this post via <a href="http://fm.schmoller.net/2012/02/montessori-schooling.html" rel="nofollow">Seb citing it</a>. I was amazed by the stellar list of Montessori alumni, and mentioned it to others. One of them gave me a sceptical look, and we soon realised it couldn't all be true. Several in that list were schooled in the 19th century, before the first Montessori school opened. Here's what I found about their Montessori connections.<br /><br />Alexander Graham Bell gave financial support to Maria Montessori, and helped start the first Montessori class in Canada<br />Thomas Edison invited Maria Montessori to the US and helped found a Montessori school<br />Henry Ford is frequently cited as a "supporter" but the nature of his support is not specified<br />Mahatma Gandhi met Maria Montessori and spoke at one of her colleges, both in October 1931<br />Sigmund Freud corresponded with Maria Montessori, and his daughter Anna is reported to have had "an interest" in Montessori education (<a rel="nofollow">source</a>)<br />Buckminster Fuller is also widely cited as a supporter, and wrote the foreword to a book by Maria Montessori's son, Mario<br />Leo Tolstoy -- I can't find any mention of a direct connection between Leo Tolstoy and Montessori beyond the same list that has been copied round the web; indirectly, his daughter Tatiana is <a href="http://orange-elephant.com/creative_stories/6" rel="nofollow">mentioned as a supporter</a><br />Bertrand Russell sent his son to a Montessori school and wrote supportively about the approach in <em>On Education</em> (<a href="http://baandek.org/blog/montessori-and-discipline-by-bertrand-russell.html" rel="nofollow">source</a>)<br />Jean Piaget carried out his first studies of children in the 1920s in a modified Montessori institution in Geneva, and Piaget was for a number of years the head of the Swiss Montessori Society, though he later became dissatisfied with Maria Montessori (<a href="http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~campber/piaget.html" rel="nofollow">source</a>)<br />Hilary and Bill Clinton sent their daughter to a Montessori school<br /><br />This doesn't take away from your point about Brin, Page, Bezos and Wales -- but clearly all those Great & Good did not have an early Montessori schooling. As philanthropists, progressive intellectuals and educators, most of whom were active about a century a go, it's not particularly remarkable that they showed interest in, and support for, one of the educational innovations of their day.David Jenningshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05003627933176529152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-12179185644019235182008-06-05T09:18:00.000+00:002008-06-05T09:18:00.000+00:00The learning in children has been an area of inter...The learning in children has been an area of interest. When my son was born I was twenty-one but I loved children. Here the play school concept is fast becoming popular. These are close to the montessori schools,my son refused to go to these. As a result I would take him evey where along me and try showing him things. If it was a magnet, we would play and see the opposite poles attracting. If he asked about botterflies, we would collect the eggs in a cardboard box and see catterpillars emerging then turning to pupa. This gave him an idea about what they feed on and their habitat. I was made fun of by women who had pushed the kids to the play schools. These play schools are not scientific and just force manners on to kids. If we bathed we experimented with archmedies principal by immersing things and collecting the displaced water. Another thing, here kids are forced to learn two languages-English and Hindi, for long I did not converse with him in second language, using only mother tiongue. Now his English is amazing, he writes novels and grammatically perfect works. Seems we need to let things flow and go easy on learning. This time I had faced tremendous stress as my daughter was being teased for not speaking' English'. I became doubtful of my stand as my mother-in-law whois a teacher started pushing it that I was making the kid suffer this by not teaching her the language. Thankfully she learned on her own but I still believe that there is a soft ware kinda thing in kid's mind that openes up at right age and this may differ with each child. Nice post Donald, thanks for so much knowledge.Rina Tripathihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16855126746398058962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-1160344991938672212006-10-08T22:03:00.000+00:002006-10-08T22:03:00.000+00:00A study by Angeline Lillard, just published in the...A study by Angeline Lillard, just published in the US-AAAS Science Magazine compared inner-city Montessori and non-Montessori students in Milwaukee and found that the latter generally performed better in all the tests (academic and behavioural)<BR/><BR/>http://www.montessori-science.org/montessori_science_journal.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-1144001732257388532006-04-02T18:15:00.000+00:002006-04-02T18:15:00.000+00:00I admire your perseverance in the face of monolith...I admire your perseverance in the face of monolithic resistance from state education. These two studies are worth reading, both available as PDFs from the site at the end of this post.<BR/><BR/>A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional Middle Schools: Motivation, Quality of Experience, and Social Context<BR/>by Kevin Rathunde<BR/><BR/>With the help of co-investigator Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Dr. Rathunde compared the experiences and perceptions of middle school students in Montessori and traditional schools using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Montessori students reported a significantly better quality of experience in their academic work than did traditional students. In addition, Montessori students perceived their schools as a more positive community for learning, with more opportunities for active, rather than passive, learning.<BR/><BR/>This study was sponsored by the North American Montessori Teachers’ Association (NAMTA, an affiliate organization of AMI) and published in The NAMTA Journal 28:3 (Summer, 2003), pages 12-52.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Outcomes for Students in a Montessori Program<BR/>A Longitudinal Study of the Experience in the Milwaukee Public Schools<BR/><BR/>"This study supports the hypothesis that Montessori education has a positive long-term impact. Additionally, it provides an affirmative answer to questions about whether Montessori students will be successful in traditional schools."<BR/><BR/>"A significant finding in this study is the association between a Montessori education and superior performance on the Math and Science scales of the ACT and WKCE. In essence, attending a Montessori program from the approximate ages of three to eleven predicts significantly higher mathematics and science standardized test scores in high school."<BR/><BR/>http://www.montessori-ami.org/research/research.htmDonald Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00796341486328270474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-1142499071500627312006-03-16T08:51:00.000+00:002006-03-16T08:51:00.000+00:00Interesting article by Steve McCormack here http:...Interesting article by Steve McCormack here http://education.independent.co.uk/schools/article351502.ece [How Montessori saved a struggling school - the startling success of progressive teaching mentods at an inner-city primary school could have serious implications for state-sector learning] in the 16/3/2006 Independent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-1142263437448419922006-03-13T15:23:00.000+00:002006-03-13T15:23:00.000+00:00Is this statistically significant? You ask the rig...Is this statistically significant? You ask the right question. Montessori schools are rarely a asign of wealth. These guys were far from wealthy - Brin born in Russia to immigrant parents, Wales had a poor rural upbringing. If we extend the analysis into other billionaires such as Sperling (University of Phoenix) he was as poor as they get in the US - his biography is harrowing. I do think that the eductaional background to internet billionaires shows not wealth as the driver but focus, intelligence, self-direction and non-mainstream educational backgrounds. When they did enter the mainstream, many of them simply droppedout.Donald Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00796341486328270474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21077063.post-1142209630147247342006-03-13T00:27:00.000+00:002006-03-13T00:27:00.000+00:00I admire Montessori schools, but I think this is j...I admire Montessori schools, but I think this is just evidence that the rich are more powerful and have better schooling.<BR/><BR/>You can use statistics and name dropping to prove or disprove anything.<BR/>Montessori also produced P.Diddy, Shari "Lamb Chop" Lewis, and Stephen "A-Team" Cannell.<BR/>And of course you could name scores of other famous people who are products of public education, simply by the sheer numbers of people in that category.<BR/><BR/>I mean, geez, George W. Bush went to Yale, and Einstein, as legend goes, was a poor student. So anything is possible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com