Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Bjork – Illusory learning… the solution… desirable difficulty…

Robert Bjork is an outstanding researcher on learning, the optimisation of memory in particular. The Bjork Learning and Forgetting Lab is a trusted source for contemporary research on cognitive science and learning theory. Hi laser focus on memory led to research with real recommendations on how to teach and study, with a particular emphasis on effortful learning using desirable difficulties,

Illusory learning

His starting point, based on research as always, is that many learners are mistaken at best, at worst delusional when it comes to judgements on whether they have learned things or not. The may feel as though they have learnt knowledge or skills but subsequent tests often show that they have not. This is why self-reporting is not a valid method when reporting learning. This illusory or delusional view of learning is very common and results in shallow teaching methods and inefficient study strategies. Bjork believes that both teaching and learning can be improved and optimised by introducing techniques that force cognitive effort. 

Desirable difficulty

Learning should not be made too easy. Counterintuitively, making learning too easy may lead to easier forgetting. This is because desirable difficulties lead to deeper cognitive effort an processing. Desirable difficulties result in better long-term retention and examples of desirable difficulties may be spaced-practice, interleaving and retrieval practice. Desirable difficulty can also mean that you have to work that little bit harder to learn, using a slightly more difficult font for example. But he calls upon several techniques to provide desirable difficulties in learning, including but not exclusively:
·      Retrieval practice
·      Spaced practice
·      Generation
·      Interleaving

Retrieval practice

Do not read repeatedly and underline text, look away from the page and try to recall what you think you know. This act of recall has a strong reinforcement effect and results in higher retention and subsequent recall. The effort in processing increases remembering. Note that retrieval practice is not a test or assessment strategy but a learning experience. It is the repeated act of retrieval that is the most powerful learning experience. This is why frequent quizzing and testing can be a powerful teaching method.

Spaced practice

Spaced practice has also been shown, from Ebbinghaus onwards, to provide desirable difficulty, making learners repeatedly retrieve what they think they know thereby increasing retention and recall. This is not easy to implement but there are many techniques, offline and online that can be used. Topping and tailing with summaries of what was learnt last time, formal nudging, even use of social media.

Generation

Generating words and knowledge is better than simply reading text. It would appear that this act of generation provides the context for greater subsequent recall. Retrieval, recalling things from memory, is a powerful learning technique.

Interleaving 

Interleaving, avoiding long sequences of similar material, interleaving very different learning tasks or variations on that task, increases retention, recall and skill acquisition. This may seem counter-intuitive but shows that, rather than learning one thing for a long time, many things can be interleaved, to the benefit of the learner.

Metacognition

When we are aware of what makes us learn better and actively monitor this process, our study practices and schedules change. Bjork recommends that learners be taught good learning practices, such as retrieval, interleaving and spaced practice to increase their efficacy in learning.

Influence

Bjork has taken, sometime known practices in learning, and used controlled studies to show that, with changes in practice we can learn more efficiently. Learning professionals and learners often engage in practices that are sub-optimal, worse still, it may inhibit efficient learning. His recommended techniques may seem counterintuitive and difficult to implement as they run counter to most current practice but the evidence suggest that he is right. We see these recommendations increasingly used in education and training as those who both teach and learn become aware of these techniques. Technology has also allowed retrieval practice, interleaving and spaced practice to be more easily implemented over time on a personalised basis

Bibliography


Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

No comments: