Friday, April 13, 2012

White (1934 - ) What is education for? Autonomy


What is education for? This key question still elicits puzzled looks, ill-formed answers, even platitudes, from students, parents, policy makers and even learning professionals. Few can fully articulate the purpose of education. John White has clear views on the subject that escapes the usual formulations to focus on the idea of autonomy. A product of London’s Institute of Education, he asks what we should do in a world where the old certainties of religion and a job for life are gone. How should we define education in a more liberal, complex, fragmented and technological world?
Autonomy
To avoid the trap of instrumentalism, seeing education as a slave to the state and employment, as well as the woolly thinking around education as a good in itself, White uses a concept that combines the needs of learner but also links directly to the needs of a democratic society. That concept is autonomy.
Autonomy, not reason or any other end, is chosen, as it defines, in terms of the self, what one must learn to be a fully functional adult in a complex world. In this sense it avoids the narrow strictures of an inflexible, over-academic curriculum, but it widens education out to deal with the individual as a rounded functioning being. The learner needs to avoid being the slave to desire but also being a slave to a given authority.
Always wary of unreflective existence, a theme going back to the Greeks, he is keen to encourage a reflective form of autonomy that is in line with our responsibilities to ourselves and others.
Curriculum
In Beyond the National Curriculum he had attacked the narrow, prescriptive definition of a curriculum, based not on evidence but the personal prejudices of politicians, a debate not unfamiliar in our own times. His alternative is an education that promotes rational, freedom of choice. The curriculum therefore needs to foster moral, intellectual, financial and practical autonomy to allow people to lead happy, healthy, lives, form relationships, cook, find jobs and think for themselves. The system is stuck in a mode that allows the people who benefit most, the middle-class, to defend its outmoded values, as it has served them well.
He is critical of current schooling, based as it is on flawed theories of intelligence, and like Illich sees a strong Calvinist tradition as lying at the root of our overly-academic curriculum, along with the political influence of highly selective schools. He is just as critical of the fuzzy thinking behind John Gardener’s ‘multiple intelligences’.
Work
Neither does he shy away from work as an important topic in education. In ‘Education and the End of Work’ he assumes a more fragmented, work environment where too narrow vocational training will leave learners ill-equipped to deal with the future. We must educate for the ability to cope with the changes that the future will bring. This is, in some ways, the weakness of his reliance on autonomy alone. It can break down when it comes to detailed policy and prescription. James Tooley was to pick up on White’s work, again using Rawls Theory of justice in a thought experiment in Reclaiming Education, where he imagines us starting again, to choose an optimal educational system. White and Tooley draw on deeper philosophical though to guide their thinking, a refreshing approach, compared to the shallower prescriptions based on personal experience.
Conclusion
White draws on analytic philosophy to ask a tough question to come up with a sophisticated answer. He succeeds in placing ‘autonomy’ at the heart of educational thinking and planning, and his approach is grounded and useful in that it is not linked to a specific political or cultural outlook. The concept of autonomy can be seen a universal good, linked to the individual, strong enough to define curricula and choices yet flexible enough to cope with a changing future.
Bibliography
White, J. (1973).Towards a compulsory curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
White, J. (1982).The Aims of Education Restated. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
White, J. (1994).Education and Personal Well-Being in a Secular Universe. London. University of London Institute of education. White, J. (1997).Education and the end of Work. London: Cassell.
White J. A properly rounded academic education  (http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/uploads/papers2011/WhiteJ.pdf)

 Subscribe to RSS

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your post has triggered a thought. When tied in with Dan Pink's work on motivation - autonomy, mastery and purpose - one part of the problem seems to be that our current system of education doesn't provide much of either. There are, of course, many other perspectives on the situation, but from a motivational angle (personal or intrinsic), you've got me thinking again. Thanks for sharing your journey with us.

4:15 PM  
Blogger Donald Clark said...

Reading White made me think in exactly this way. It made me suspect teachers and educationalists who simply fall back on the idea that what they do is an intrinsic good an doesn't need goals, aims and purpose. It's a lazy sort of thinking.

4:32 PM  
Blogger shahid said...

Thanks for the information.

accredited online colleges |
accredited online education |
what is online education |
online colleges and universities |
online education |
online colleges |
online universities |
universities |
accredited colleges |
accredited schools |
colleges in new york |
colleges in seattle |
colleges in london |
colleges in chicago |
universities in new york |
universities in seattle |
universities london |

8:52 AM  
Blogger shahid said...

Thanks for the information.

accredited online colleges |
accredited online education |
what is online education |
online colleges and universities |
online education |
online colleges |
online universities |
universities |
accredited colleges |
accredited schools |
colleges in new york |
colleges in seattle |
colleges in london |
colleges in chicago |
universities in new york |
universities in seattle |
universities london |

8:55 AM  
Blogger shahid said...

mba degree |
accredited degrees |
online healthcare degrees |
online bachelor degrees |
online bachelors degrees |
online master degrees |
online masters degrees |
online mba degrees |
mba degrees |
online associate degree |
online associates degree |
online finance degree |
online accounting degree |
criminal justice degree |
online criminal justice degree |
seo in karachi |
seo training karachi |
seo services karachi |

8:56 AM  
Blogger shahid said...

seo in karachi |
seo training karachi |
seo services karachi |
seo karachi |
software house in karachi |
sell tickets online for your event |
exporters from pakistan karachi |

8:57 AM  
Anonymous carl gombrich said...

I'm not sure I quite understand what is being said here, but I think the situation is subtle. As Young and Muller (Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: lessons from the sociology of knowledge, European Journal of Education, Vol. 45, No 1, 2010, Part I)say: 'knowledge is emergent from and not reducible to the contexts in which it is produced and acquired'. I've tried to give a take on this on my blog contrasting 'design for learning' and 'emergent outcomes' http://www.carlgombrich.org/design-for-learning-vs-emergent-outcomes/. Of course you need SOME aims and purpose when teaching (otherwise it is hard to imagine that there would be any learning scenario ever to speak of!), but such aims can be quite abstract and general and can be allowed to emerge as the course progresses, rather than be nailed on as somewhere to aim at before the learning starts. As I understand it Pink argues for intrinsic motivations and having too much in the way of goals and objectives mitigates against this.

10:40 PM  
Anonymous Property Dealers in Delhi NCR said...

You have posted innovative news, keep it up. Thanks for sharing.

4:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home