Our learning world, at all levels, in schools, HE and the workplace, including offline and
online learning, suffers from one obsession that leads to massive waste and low
productivity – an obsession with time. timetabling habits into the online world.
The metrics almost universally cost ‘teaching and learning’ like sausages…. by the pound/kilo - face time, contact time, fixed length courses, and hour of learner time in online learning. All are metrics that work against efficient delivery. The tyranny time is the disease that disables the learning world and by altering how we see 'learning time, a lot of time, money and wasted effort by teachers and learners could be saved.
The metrics almost universally cost ‘teaching and learning’ like sausages…. by the pound/kilo - face time, contact time, fixed length courses, and hour of learner time in online learning. All are metrics that work against efficient delivery. The tyranny time is the disease that disables the learning world and by altering how we see 'learning time, a lot of time, money and wasted effort by teachers and learners could be saved.
Higher Education
The one hour lecture, that pedagogic staple in HE, is an
hour long simply because the Sumerians had a base-60 number system - hence the ‘hour’. It bears no relation to the
psychology of attention or efficient pedagogy. It is quite simply the slavish
adherence to a fossilised method of delivery that is easy for faculty to
timetable. Even then, attendance is often appalling (40% don't turn up even at Harvard), and often not recorded, rendering even rudimentary attempts at measurement
meaningless. University terms still adhere to a mixture of old professional timetables (primarily the Law profession), religious festivals and an 18th century
agricultural calendar, with long holidays, that are periods of forgetting. Fixed three and four year length degree courses with
only one start date per year, take no account of actual needs. Oh, and lets
build and market ‘Masters’ Degrees to that we can add yet another year. Nowhere
is the tyranny of time more crude and obvious than in Higher Education.
Schools
Similarly in schools, that mimic Universities, as they must
be kept in sych. This is another form of tyranny as schools are now their feeders,
despite the fact that the majority of young people do not take that route. The
‘period’ in schools mimics the ‘lecture’ where millions of young people pack up,
stand up and shuffle through crowded corridors to another identical room where
they have to unpack, sit down and settle again. This waste of time is immense.
Imagine running a company where all employees have to rise on the hour and move
somewhere else? Can't teacher's walk? And again the tyranny of an ancient calendar, where
unhealthy doses of forgetting punctuate the year, determine the rhythm of
learning, which should be steady... not full on, nothing, full on, nothing…..
Workplace
An obsession with padded out ‘courses’ from compliance to whatever fad
arises (Emotional Intelligence, NLP. Mindfulness and so on) means days of
wasted time doing courses that have little or no effect on performance. Get people to travel from all over, then batch
people through, in dull rooms with round tables, bowls of mints, coloured pens
and some half-baked attempt at collaboration, where you throw out a vague question,
discuss at the table, feedback on flipchart paper, which gets pinned on the
wall, then the promise that the results will be sent to you – they never are.
These courses are always delivered by the half-day, full day, or worse, days on
end and when it comes to impact the adherence to a ridiculous mode of evaluation (Kirkpatrick) means very little is meaningfully measured.
Online learning
Just as bad is online learning, bought and sold by the ‘learner
hour’, mimicking the University and school model. Rather then focus on value
and the idea that this really can save time, it encourages vendors to
over-deliver so that they can charge more. The net result is overdesigned
content, with oodles of meaningless, illustrative graphics, thinly punctuated
by multiple-choice questions, and maybe some Pavlovian gamification (so that a
premium price can be paid). Even MOOCs were foolishly deigned to match
University semesters, with a drip feed of content over up to 10 weeks – and
they wonder why people fell to the wayside?
What to do?
So the tyranny of time comes in many guises, the lecture,
period, semester, term, course, clickthrough online learning and degree. Some make it worse by recommending
lifelong learning, in the form of going back to college – life as one long
course. No thanks. Life is far too short for that nonsense. By and large all
of these take too long as they suffer from the following flaws:
1. Fixed form of
delivery
Most ‘teaching and learning’ is shaped by pre-existing,
fixed modes of delivery, the lecture, period, term, module, course and so on. This
‘ass before elbow’ mode of delivery should be shaped by the type of learning, needs
of learners and resources, not mode of delivery. The solution is to imagine
that the learning experience doesn’t exist, take it back to a blank slate, now
re-design. Match modes of delivery to the typology of learning, learning needs
and resources. Look to make everything shorter and more efficient for the
learner. Some call this Blended Learning - that doesn’t mean a bit of online
bolted on to a bit of classroom, let’s call that Velcro Learning, and don’t confuse Blended ‘Learning’ with Blended ‘Teaching’, where you simply slice and
dice a bit of your old and new delivery methods and call it a ‘Blend’. Escape
the tyranny of time and focus on value.
2. Sheep dip
Most teaching is a one-off event. It is ridiculous not to
record lectures, even if you think it’s a poor form of pedagogy (which I do).
Denying learners a second and third bite of the cherry is ridiculous – they may
be ill, miss points, not understand at first pass, have trouble note taking,
have the language of teaching as a second language. Above all the psychology of
learning shows that repeated access for reinforcement and retrieval through revision is necessary for efficient learning. There is a strong argument
for doing the same in schools. I’ve seen this work magnificently in an Italian school, yet few have ever thought about doing it.
3. Forgetting
Let’s not forget that single, fixed timetabled events ignore
a well known principle in learning – that the brain forgets almost everything
it’s taught. Ebbinghaus showed us this in 1885 and the learning world has
studiously ignored the principle that learners need, not repetition but
retrieval and deliberate practice. Learning needs to be repeatedly accessible,
say through recorded lectures right through to spaced practice techniques such
as top and tailing, note taking, repeated testing, up to algorithmically
determined, personalised deliberate practice. Deliberate, effortful, spaced-practice frees
learners from the tyranny of single event, sheep-dip learning.
4. Batching
Courses tend to batch learners who have to go through the linear
course at the same pace. In any group you will have a distribution curve, where
you only hit those in the middle. There will be tails of learners who find the
experience too slow or too fast. Personalised delivery, now possible through
adaptive, online learning, allows you to deliver learning to an individual,
informed by their progress and aggregated data from all who took the course
before. This results in increased attainment and lower dropout.
5. Less is more
In designing learning experiences, the ‘Garbage-In
Garbage-Out’ rule is not taken seriously enough. I’ve seen far too many long
compliance documents and over-engineered courses throw far too much detail at
learners. Lecturers pad out lectures to fit their ‘hour’. Course designers fill
out a timetable with unnecessary content and activities. The net result is
actually lower learning, retention and recall. Cognitive overload results in
less, not more, being retained. Research from large data sets has shown that
video in learning tends to fall of a cliff at around 6 minutes. The consequence
being that video should be that length or shorter.
The psychology of learning screams ‘less is more’ at us. Cut
down documents until they bleed then cut them down again, so that the content
is learning ready. There are few courses I’ve seen that can’t have up to 25-30%
cut out – all the padding. There is no doubt that lecturers pad out to the
hour, the same with classroom teachers and organisational trainers. Rather than
plan to fill the time, like an empty vessel that needs to be topped up, look at
making the learning experience as short as possible. Think about what learners
‘must’ learn, not generally what they ‘could’ learn. Of all the techniques to
free learners from the tyranny of time this one is by far the most productive. This is precisely what we've been doing with WildFire - using AI to cut down on content creation time and learner time with crisp, open-input, online learning.
6. Failure to chunk
Chunking is a pretty basic pie of learning theory – that our
working memory is limited and that throwing overlong learning experiences at
the learner is counter productive. It happens all the time. We teach people to
write essays by repeatedly getting them to ‘write essays’ rather than breaking
that task down into its constituent parts. Whole word teaching was an almost
perfect example of this approach to teaching that resulted in catastrophic
failure in reading in UK schools. Learning experiences have to have focus.
7. Digital by default
Rethinking learning around, not existing modes of delivery
and fixed timetables, but more flexible methods of delivery that suit the type
of learning, learners and resources is badly needed. More often than not this
means more 365/24/7 availability by being online. Being digital by default,
wherever is practical, turns time-tabled learning experiences into anytime
learning. Asynchronous often makes more sense than synchronous, even of its
recorded lectures and resources. Switch away from a dependence on courses to an
on-demand model.
Conclusion
In practice, as you get older and become a more self-sufficient
learner, you realise that freedom from the tyranny of time is the real trick to
learning. You literally ‘learn’ how to learn by being measured, having focus,
rehearsal, retrieval – by avoiding the waste of time that are courses and
degrees. That’s lifelong learning. Life is short, it's made even shorter by wasting so much time learning and not living.
2 comments:
Yes. When we shifted from courses to resources I was perplexed by this question: 'how long does it take to complete?'. How long does it take to complete Google? It's an odd thing to ask, when you have created something designed to be used at the point of need. I think it's another hang-up from the conventional learning era where we would sit, captive, and be subjected to an information dump.
I glad you left just a tiny bit in there for those of us who agree with you on where we need to get to, but work in institutions that we can only change incrementally.
Post a Comment