Daniel Willingham, Professor of Psychology at the University of Virginia, has a background in research on learning and memory which he has masterfully turned into concrete advice for teachers in schools. He is an advocate for turning research in cognitive science into practice in education, both in teaching and the promotion of optimal study strategies for learners.
Memory matters as we have instant recall from long-term memory which helps us make instinctive decisions. This is why Willingham derides those who demote knowledge at the expense of teaching and learning strategies that focus largely on exploratory or discovery learning.
Nine cognitive principles
In Why Don't Students Like School? Willingham has nine cognitive principles about learners, which if taken on board by teachers, will improve teacher performance. He thinks that thinking does not come naturally to learners and that one must be sensitive to a number if findings in cognitive science to be an optimal teacher and learner. Memory and cognition really do matter and to ignore what we know about these findings in cognitive science is, for Willingham, to work blind or worse to adopt fads live learning styles and the 21st century skills agenda. These are his nine cognitive principles:
People are naturally curious, but they are not naturally good thinkers.
Factual knowledge must precede skill.
Memory is the residue of thought.
We understand new things in the context of things we already know and most of what we know is concrete.
It is virtually impossible to become proficient at a mental task without extended practice.
Cognition early in training is fundamentally different from cognition late in training.
Children are more alike than different in terms of how they think and learn.
Children do differ in intelligence, but intelligence can be changed through sustained hard work.
Teaching, like any complex cognitive skill, must be practice to be improved.
A critic of learning styles, he thinks that teachers mistake the idea that learners are different for other differences, especially ‘ability’. His belief that knowledge precedes skills has led to his critique of the teaching of 21st century skills. Like almost all cognitive psychologists, he thinks the evidence is clear that ‘learning styles’ do not exist. He thinks that learning styles as a theory of how people learn, a theory of learning, is quite simply false.
21st century skills
Willingham thinks that the 21st century skills agenda is not only flawed but dangerous, in that it harms the poorest students and students of colour hardest. The flaw, he thinks, is in thinking that knowledge and skills are separate entities, when they are entwined. To think critically or creatively or to problem solve is to use knowledge central to the domain. To be creative or critical in science or coding, you need to know science and how to code. The danger is in introducing complex 21st century skills too early (he quotes ‘New Maths of the 60s as an example). He is sceptical about teaching self-direction, collaboration, creativity, and innovation. Are they teachable or just an excuse to bring back exploratory learner-centric models? There is little evidence that they can be taught and, in practice, teachers rarely employ this approach in practice. So, without clear proof that they can be taught, better assessment the focus on “21st-century skills” will be shallow. This mean we “will sacrifice long-term gains for the appearance of short-term progress”.
Willingham is seen as part of the backlash against progressive methods, that many see as not only having gone too far but actually harmful to poor students.
Willingham, D.T., 2009. Why don't students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Willingham, D.T., 2007. Critical thinking: Why it is so hard to teach?. American federation of teachers summer 2007, p. 8-19.
Rotherham, A.J. and Willingham, D.T., 2010. 21st-Century” skills. American Educator, 17(1), pp.17-20.
Willingham, D.T., Hughes, E.M. and Dobolyi, D.G., 2015. The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), pp.266-271.
To know more about Chief Dr Lucky you can visit his website (https://chiefdrluckyherbaltherapy.wordpress.com/)
A friend that suffered from Herpes and was cure with the help of this great herbal doctor (Chief Lucky) so i decided to contact him for help in getting rid of my families genital herpes virus 1/2 which i did and all i was told to provide was just some useful information and some materials used in preparation of the natural cure and that i did and now i am the happiest person on earth because i am writing this testimony of mine with joy and happiness in my heart to the whole world to know that natural remedy is real because i am a living testimony of Chief Lucky traditional herbal cure and i want you all to contact Chief Lucky via his email: email@example.com or WhatsApp him +2348132777335 am sure he will help you too.
Post a Comment